multiplayer-only races

aghabozorg

as we all know that adding new race with all doctorines in DOW3 is hard enough,what is your opinion about multiplayer-only races? adding all the races with campaign will be even harder and needs so much time so we may not see our favorite races
for example relic can add chaos (more daemonic) or any other race that wont be in the future story line just for multiplayer and then as we all expect add necrones with campaign

jonoliveira12

@aghabozorg said:
as we all know that adding new race with all doctorines in DOW3 is hard enough,what is your opinion about multiplayer-only races? adding all the races with campaign will be even harder and needs so much time so we may not see our favorite races
for example relic can add chaos (more daemonic) or any other race that wont be in the future story line just for multiplayer and then as we all expect add necrones with campaign

I would be OK with it, provided the pricing is right. I still expect Necrons to have a Campaign, though.

CANNED_F3TUS

Yeah i wouldnt mind chaos not having a campaign. Imo giant expansions are not the way to go. It takes way to long to get anything out when you can just release DLC for decent price and get the ++heresy redacted++ out early....

Fww

Yeah it would a good way to keep multiplayer interesting, like they did in coh2 with Brits.

Psychodrake

Yeah I actually agree. One of my gripes with DoW3, if not my only gripe, is the lack of playable races.

I don't really care if they get a narrative entry or not, I'd rather just have them available to boost content.

KhraKsarsar

I prefer the new races to be working properly in multiplayer, as more factions means much more balancing. Stories really can come up much later, as we anticipate them. I am a gameplay based person. Or if they may consider slipping in some lore inside multiplayer somehow, I have no idea myself on how they might do that tho.

aghabozorg

@KhraKsarsar said:
I prefer the new races to be working properly in multiplayer, as more factions means much more balancing

agree.thats the real challenge for relic

aghabozorg

i really like to see 1 new race in multiplayer before necrons (i prefer chaos or imperial guards)

Pringworm

Why not Squats?

Draconix

@Pringworm said:
Why not Squats?

Becuase in lore wise Squats population were almost annihilated due to Tyranid attack at their homeworld.

Also Games Workshop had ceased producing and selling Squat models as well.

Pringworm

@Draconix said:

@Pringworm said:
Why not Squats?

Becuase in lore wise Squats population were almost annihilated due to Tyranid attack at their homeworld.

Also Games Workshop had ceased producing and selling Squat models as well.

Shame, I wanted to see a Squat roll to kill a squad of chaos traitors lol.

CANNED_F3TUS

@Pringworm said:
Why not Squats?

Yeah squats were like the 40 k dwarfs almost

Pegleg

@CANNED_F3TUS said:

@Pringworm said:
Why not Squats?

Yeah squats were like the 40 k dwarfs almost

Strange they backed out of that, but not the Necrons.

Katitof

@Pegleg said:

@CANNED_F3TUS said:

@Pringworm said:
Why not Squats?

Yeah squats were like the 40 k dwarfs almost

Strange they backed out of that, but not the Necrons.

Necrons are important for 40k lore(Fall of Cadia and few revelations there anyone?), squats not so much.

Pegleg

@Katitof said:

@Pegleg said:

@CANNED_F3TUS said:

@Pringworm said:
Why not Squats?

Yeah squats were like the 40 k dwarfs almost

Strange they backed out of that, but not the Necrons.

Necrons are important for 40k lore(Fall of Cadia and few revelations there anyone?), squats not so much.

I mean before any established lore.

Katitof

@Pegleg said:

@Katitof said:

@Pegleg said:

@CANNED_F3TUS said:

@Pringworm said:
Why not Squats?

Yeah squats were like the 40 k dwarfs almost

Strange they backed out of that, but not the Necrons.

Necrons are important for 40k lore(Fall of Cadia and few revelations there anyone?), squats not so much.

I mean before any established lore.

They still were more important on the sole reason of not originating from a single rock + people actually buy their minis compared to squats.

There are only 2 reasons GW would stop selling content.
1) The content got update and there is new one
2) The content didn't sell well and it became irrelevant.

Pringworm

@Katitof said:

@Pegleg said:

@Katitof said:

@Pegleg said:

@CANNED_F3TUS said:

@Pringworm said:
Why not Squats?

Yeah squats were like the 40 k dwarfs almost

Strange they backed out of that, but not the Necrons.

Necrons are important for 40k lore(Fall of Cadia and few revelations there anyone?), squats not so much.

I mean before any established lore.

They still were more important on the sole reason of not originating from a single rock + people actually buy their minis compared to squats.

There are only 2 reasons GW would stop selling content.
1) The content got update and there is new one
2) The content didn't sell well and it became irrelevant.

I think he means by comparison of its fantasy equivalent, which I believe is the Tomb Kings. But they actually younger than the Necrons right?

CANNED_F3TUS

Eeeh necrons aint that important. Hardly ever hear of em. Just get screen time here and there.

aghabozorg

necrons are important.they are ancient beyond reckoning, pre-dating even the eldar.they fought the old ones