@Nassir_Amit said:
Yes, I like him and his content. A man of principle he is.
And what does "acting like an pretentious buffon mean"? That he seems to sound or pretending to do professional reviews? He states his opinion and I agree with most of it. Others don t.
Lmao. Just google pretentious and you will know what it means.
I dont know why Arch got so many insults from dow 3 fanboys. When I saw his 2 videos I could see that he was actually sharing opinions and experience of many players who expressed their insatisfaction towards dow3. He actually discribed it pretty well and it was not only about the lore and flip flops.
Its not just DoW 3 fanboys that dont like him trust me. People dont like him for various reasons. Be it his nasally voice, as kat said pretentious, arrogant, clueless about certain material (for the most part with video games) and when there is something he doesnt like he starts whining,qqing and flaming like a lil (super redact) TW WH 2 prices and flaming about ratlings not functioning in the game as he expected and wanted to function and then goes on a rant.
When you read metacritics , you could just realise how the guys who wrote them were disconnected from reality on operational level.
Dont really care about meta critics and game reviews. Some are ++heresy redacted++ (like you mentioned "disconnected" some are good. All depends.
Wh40 has so many fans . People by instinct prefer to see someting familiar ( it is not nostalgia) than something completely new, specialy if it is downgraded.
Its different for everybody. For some its nostalgia, others its the style or pace of the game even core mechanics. Some dont like base building, Some cant think for themselves etc etc Cant just put em all in 1 bucket. And i would not consider DoW 3 downgraded. There are quite a few things it does better than the previous titles but also some things its worse at. Every DoW had short comings somewhere.
Maybe in good time they will add new or improved mechanics from the old games that they just couldnt impliment on the first go due to difficulties or not having enough time.
@Nassir_Amit said:
Yes, I like him and his content. A man of principle he is.
And what does "acting like an pretentious buffon mean"? That he seems to sound or pretending to do professional reviews? He states his opinion and I agree with most of it. Others don t.
Lmao. Just google pretentious and you will know what it means.
Oh,you don t like his attitude.
Fine
Its far more than that nassir. I explained it to you before. But again you chose to ignore it or forgot about it, i dunno.
@Nassir_Amit said:
Yes, I like him and his content. A man of principle he is.
And what does "acting like an pretentious buffon mean"? That he seems to sound or pretending to do professional reviews? He states his opinion and I agree with most of it. Others don t.
Lmao. Just google pretentious and you will know what it means.
Oh,you don t like his attitude.
Fine
Its far more than that nassir. I explained it to you before. But again you chose to ignore it or forgot about it, i dunno.
Yes
So you ignored or forgotted his explanation. Fine. This shows that you are so stubborn to stick to your own, even if someone will explain to you.
@Nassir_Amit said:
Yes, I like him and his content. A man of principle he is.
And what does "acting like an pretentious buffon mean"? That he seems to sound or pretending to do professional reviews? He states his opinion and I agree with most of it. Others don t.
Lmao. Just google pretentious and you will know what it means.
Oh,you don t like his attitude.
Fine
Its far more than that nassir. I explained it to you before. But again you chose to ignore it or forgot about it, i dunno.
Yes
So you ignored or forgotted his explanation. Fine. This shows that you are so stubborn to stick to your own, even if someone will explain to you.
I stick to my own opinion as he has not provided something to persuade me. If he doesn t like Arch as an person I don t care.
Still it doesn't change the fact for me that Arch is a toxic and ranting streamer who is obsessed about lore.
My biggest problem with Arch (and trolls in general) is that he takes everything so personally that there is no room for reason. Relic has so offended him that he has a personal vendetta against them. Even if they do something that he likes, he sees it as Relic capitulating. He's so far gone that I don't think he'd be satisfied unless Relic goes out of business and there is no more DOW. Even then, he'd still be crowing about how he won some meaningless victory. It's just bizarre and sickening to listen to someone devote so much rage to something so petty.
What Arch is doing is not mentally healthy and I hope he isn't encouraging people to think it's normal to react this way.
Can't believe that there are actually parrots that listen to the turd that ArchWarhammer is, his content is toxic to say the least. Out of his 100k subs, 3% actually watch the vids he puts up, even less like it. The problem is that he is wrong on many things and is arrogant about it, if a person can afford to be arrogant I don't have a problem with it however him being arrogant is pathetic as he is nothing.
Compare his video on DoW3 to the one that Totalbiscuit made, I don't like him either, as he is on the payrole of Blizzard. Yet TB manages to raise valid points as to why he doesn't like something and is able to talk like an adult without ranting like a litte kid. I don't have a problem with his critique on DoW3 as it was justified imo.
However the diffrence between AW and TB is very obvious and that probably is why TB actually got hired by Blizzard and didn't develop into some angry kid trapped in a mans body fantasizing about a company crawling on their knees.
@Nassir_Amit said:
Yes, I like him and his content. A man of principle he is.
And what does "acting like an pretentious buffon mean"? That he seems to sound or pretending to do professional reviews? He states his opinion and I agree with most of it. Others don t.
Lmao. Just google pretentious and you will know what it means.
Oh,you don t like his attitude.
Fine
Its far more than that nassir. I explained it to you before. But again you chose to ignore it or forgot about it, i dunno.
Yes
So you ignored or forgotted his explanation. Fine. This shows that you are so stubborn to stick to your own, even if someone will explain to you.
I stick to my own opinion as he has not provided something to persuade me. If he doesn t like Arch as an person I don t care.
We did provided you a lengthy list of arguments.
You have chosen to deflect them and not only not respond to them at all, you flat out ignored them and proceeded to repeating yourself.
You're literally covering your ears and screaming "lalalalala can't hear you lalalalala" only because we're saying something that you don't like.
And its hardly the first time you do it exactly like this. It goes the same with any silly stuff you support - you are being presented with hard, unquestionable evidence, sometimes backed by OVER A DECADE of empirical evidence and you still choose to pretend it doesn't exist and go your own way.
Of course he has "not provided something to persuade you".
You have firmly chosen NOT to be persuaded.
You slowly start to remind one of the "earth is flat" people with ignoring evidence, pretending facts don't exist, even if people shove them up your face and listen to someone who has no idea what he is talking about.
FFS, when was the last time Arch posted anything about DOW III? 5 months ago? He has like 3-4 vids ever posted on the matter? At this rate I'm absolutely sure he completely forgot about existence of this game and you guys still remember him as some kind of nemesis? Isn't it a bit pathetic?... Move on already.
@Nassir_Amit , so what that Relic messed up with Dow3 on launch? I enjoyed that game regardless. Besides I see that you and especially Arch don't want actually give a change to get some love from Relic.
You call it disaster? I suppose that its launch wasn't much worse than CnC4 on launch. Dow3 has really a potential, but you tend to ignore or even give it a second chance until Relic reworks it to be more like Dow2. So I'm asking, if you love Dow2 so much, why don't you go back to the game you like rather than trashing on a game you don't like?
Even if Dow3 had a bad start, it still deserves for a second chance and improvement, but those who disliked this game so much has to swallow their pride and give this game a second chance. Let's not be selfishly stubborn and closed minded as most are and try this game at least once.
@Stoner said:
FFS, when was the last time Arch posted anything about DOW III? 5 months ago? He has like 3-4 vids ever posted on the matter? At this rate I'm absolutely sure he completely forgot about existence of this game and you guys still remember him as some kind of nemesis? Isn't it a bit pathetic?... Move on already.
Somebody raised him as a quote for valid criticism of the game. Others responded to that. I don't think you'd enjoy being told to "move on already", so please do not tell other posters how to behave.
That said, we are stopping with the unnecessary language, when describing anyone. That goes for calling people trolls, other words that apparently aren't swear-filtered, "flat earthers", or anything inbetween. Regardless of them being an active member of this forum or not. If there isn't basic respect between people and their ideas, no actual debate can occur.
I hope Relic would add some "practice missions" as was discussed in another thread.
The game is very heavy on the gimmick play and I've just happened to won a round purely on 3 Scouts and 4 WW's against equal\better Ork with how I've landed abilities (I know, 4 WW's is close to suicide, but I've lost next to everything on a stupid move).
Seriously, this situation could be fit into some valuable practice: Charon's Rest, 2 "lanes" when vehicles can pass, AI Ork (no offence, just an example) comming from the one of it with all he has under the Waagh and you have a set number Scouts, WhrillWinds and the PowerCore to stop him.
We had to play ~30 minutes for this situation to occur - just imagine someone playing this long and missing with those abilities.
Of course, it could be set in reverse: you're Ork, AI is SM, and you have to divide your forces on this much of waves to destroy the core and pass under the hail of blind grenades and barrages.
There are many interesting situations that can be reproduced before they will actually occur - could save a lot of nerves for those who ahve just started with the game.
@Draconix said: @Nassir_Amit , so what that Relic messed up with Dow3 on launch? I enjoyed that game regardless. Besides I see that you and especially Arch don't want actually give a change to get some love from Relic.
You call it disaster? I suppose that its launch wasn't much worse than CnC4 on launch. Dow3 has really a potential, but you tend to ignore or even give it a second chance until Relic reworks it to be more like Dow2. So I'm asking, if you love Dow2 so much, why don't you go back to the game you like rather than trashing on a game you don't like?
Even if Dow3 had a bad start, it still deserves for a second chance and improvement, but those who disliked this game so much has to swallow their pride and give this game a second chance. Let's not be selfishly stubborn and closed minded as most are and try this game at least once.
Have you even read any of my suggestions regarding the game? I'm actively for keeping the base mechanics.
To say though they are perfect right now
is far from the truth and thats why I suggest solutuons to circumvent this
Ah, I see. But knew that even if you like Arch's opinion, while you want to give some solutions to this game, Arch on other hand, simply don't want to give the game second chance.
You like his opinion, but now I know that you're not like him. At least I gave that game a chance and I enjoyed it. Arch is stubborn to do this and even to swallow his pride. At least Total Biscuiy and Valrak, though they didn't liked that game too, aren't same as him. And I respect, partically Valrak, because I watched his vid, and I understanded that, but I respected this, since he isn't as much toxic and ranting streamer as Arch actually is.
@Draconix said: @Nassir_Amit , so what that Relic messed up with Dow3 on launch? I enjoyed that game regardless. Besides I see that you and especially Arch don't want actually give a change to get some love from Relic.
You call it disaster? I suppose that its launch wasn't much worse than CnC4 on launch. Dow3 has really a potential, but you tend to ignore or even give it a second chance until Relic reworks it to be more like Dow2. So I'm asking, if you love Dow2 so much, why don't you go back to the game you like rather than trashing on a game you don't like?
Even if Dow3 had a bad start, it still deserves for a second chance and improvement, but those who disliked this game so much has to swallow their pride and give this game a second chance. Let's not be selfishly stubborn and closed minded as most are and try this game at least once.
Have you even read any of my suggestions regarding the game? I'm actively for keeping the base mechanics.
To say though they are perfect right now
is far from the truth and thats why I suggest solutuons to circumvent this
Ah, I see. But knew that even if you like Arch's opinion, while you want to give some solutions to this game, Arch on other hand, simply don't want to give the game second chance.
You like his opinion, but now I know that you're not like him. At least I gave that game a chance and I enjoyed it. Arch is stubborn to do this and even to swallow his pride. At least Total Biscuiy and Valrak, though they didn't liked that game too, aren't same as him. And I respect, partically Valrak, because I watched his vid, and I understanded that, but I respected this, since he isn't as much toxic and ranting streamer as Arch actually is.
In his last video regarding DoW III, Arch was optimistic about DoWIII's further content involving more the community.
And Arch's way to talk is not everybody's thing and an small amount of rant videos, yet labeling him automatically toxic and ranting is unfair as this is his way to tell his opinion. His content is rock solid.
Well I can said it is matter of tastes, but I understand that you like his content. Still doesn't mean that everyone should like his content. I for example would prefer other streamer's content, especially those who are enjoying streaming this game like @2Sk3TCHY or Pshyc and even @FoxClaw. But as I said and I believe, its a matter of tastes.
Menu
Comments
TokyoDream
Other than no option to rebind hotkeys, I can't think of anything "lacking" from the interface.
a7threalm
Preset elite choices in the ui, so it is one click for the setup you want.
a7threalm
so your elite and doctrines and set with the click of one button, it could be on the bottom of the loading screen to max of say 5 or 10
and wasd option using autohotkey now to make it work, kinda lame
CANNED_F3TUS
Its not just DoW 3 fanboys that dont like him trust me. People dont like him for various reasons. Be it his nasally voice, as kat said pretentious, arrogant, clueless about certain material (for the most part with video games) and when there is something he doesnt like he starts whining,qqing and flaming like a lil (super redact) TW WH 2 prices and flaming about ratlings not functioning in the game as he expected and wanted to function and then goes on a rant.
Dont really care about meta critics and game reviews. Some are ++heresy redacted++ (like you mentioned "disconnected" some are good. All depends.
Its different for everybody. For some its nostalgia, others its the style or pace of the game even core mechanics. Some dont like base building, Some cant think for themselves etc etc Cant just put em all in 1 bucket. And i would not consider DoW 3 downgraded. There are quite a few things it does better than the previous titles but also some things its worse at. Every DoW had short comings somewhere.
Maybe in good time they will add new or improved mechanics from the old games that they just couldnt impliment on the first go due to difficulties or not having enough time.
CANNED_F3TUS
Its far more than that nassir. I explained it to you before. But again you chose to ignore it or forgot about it, i dunno.
Draconix
So you ignored or forgotted his explanation. Fine. This shows that you are so stubborn to stick to your own, even if someone will explain to you.
Draconix
Still it doesn't change the fact for me that Arch is a toxic and ranting streamer who is obsessed about lore.
TokyoDream
My biggest problem with Arch (and trolls in general) is that he takes everything so personally that there is no room for reason. Relic has so offended him that he has a personal vendetta against them. Even if they do something that he likes, he sees it as Relic capitulating. He's so far gone that I don't think he'd be satisfied unless Relic goes out of business and there is no more DOW. Even then, he'd still be crowing about how he won some meaningless victory. It's just bizarre and sickening to listen to someone devote so much rage to something so petty.
What Arch is doing is not mentally healthy and I hope he isn't encouraging people to think it's normal to react this way.
Endstille
Can't believe that there are actually parrots that listen to the turd that ArchWarhammer is, his content is toxic to say the least. Out of his 100k subs, 3% actually watch the vids he puts up, even less like it. The problem is that he is wrong on many things and is arrogant about it, if a person can afford to be arrogant I don't have a problem with it however him being arrogant is pathetic as he is nothing.
Compare his video on DoW3 to the one that Totalbiscuit made, I don't like him either, as he is on the payrole of Blizzard. Yet TB manages to raise valid points as to why he doesn't like something and is able to talk like an adult without ranting like a litte kid. I don't have a problem with his critique on DoW3 as it was justified imo.
However the diffrence between AW and TB is very obvious and that probably is why TB actually got hired by Blizzard and didn't develop into some angry kid trapped in a mans body fantasizing about a company crawling on their knees.
Katitof
We did provided you a lengthy list of arguments.
You have chosen to deflect them and not only not respond to them at all, you flat out ignored them and proceeded to repeating yourself.
You're literally covering your ears and screaming "lalalalala can't hear you lalalalala" only because we're saying something that you don't like.
And its hardly the first time you do it exactly like this. It goes the same with any silly stuff you support - you are being presented with hard, unquestionable evidence, sometimes backed by OVER A DECADE of empirical evidence and you still choose to pretend it doesn't exist and go your own way.
Of course he has "not provided something to persuade you".
You have firmly chosen NOT to be persuaded.
You slowly start to remind one of the "earth is flat" people with ignoring evidence, pretending facts don't exist, even if people shove them up your face and listen to someone who has no idea what he is talking about.
That is literally a recurring theme for you.
Endstille
LuL no.
Like I said compare his ++heresy redacted++ to tb.
Stoner
FFS, when was the last time Arch posted anything about DOW III? 5 months ago? He has like 3-4 vids ever posted on the matter? At this rate I'm absolutely sure he completely forgot about existence of this game and you guys still remember him as some kind of nemesis? Isn't it a bit pathetic?... Move on already.
Draconix
@Nassir_Amit , so what that Relic messed up with Dow3 on launch? I enjoyed that game regardless. Besides I see that you and especially Arch don't want actually give a change to get some love from Relic.
You call it disaster? I suppose that its launch wasn't much worse than CnC4 on launch. Dow3 has really a potential, but you tend to ignore or even give it a second chance until Relic reworks it to be more like Dow2. So I'm asking, if you love Dow2 so much, why don't you go back to the game you like rather than trashing on a game you don't like?
Even if Dow3 had a bad start, it still deserves for a second chance and improvement, but those who disliked this game so much has to swallow their pride and give this game a second chance. Let's not be selfishly stubborn and closed minded as most are and try this game at least once.
Gorb
Somebody raised him as a quote for valid criticism of the game. Others responded to that. I don't think you'd enjoy being told to "move on already", so please do not tell other posters how to behave.
That said, we are stopping with the unnecessary language, when describing anyone. That goes for calling people trolls, other words that apparently aren't swear-filtered, "flat earthers", or anything inbetween. Regardless of them being an active member of this forum or not. If there isn't basic respect between people and their ideas, no actual debate can occur.
There's no need to respond to this post, either.
Moderator Post
Ololo111
I hope Relic would add some "practice missions" as was discussed in another thread.
The game is very heavy on the gimmick play and I've just happened to won a round purely on 3 Scouts and 4 WW's against equal\better Ork with how I've landed abilities (I know, 4 WW's is close to suicide, but I've lost next to everything on a stupid move).
Seriously, this situation could be fit into some valuable practice: Charon's Rest, 2 "lanes" when vehicles can pass, AI Ork (no offence, just an example) comming from the one of it with all he has under the Waagh and you have a set number Scouts, WhrillWinds and the PowerCore to stop him.
We had to play ~30 minutes for this situation to occur - just imagine someone playing this long and missing with those abilities.
Of course, it could be set in reverse: you're Ork, AI is SM, and you have to divide your forces on this much of waves to destroy the core and pass under the hail of blind grenades and barrages.
There are many interesting situations that can be reproduced before they will actually occur - could save a lot of nerves for those who ahve just started with the game.
Draconix
Ah, I see. But knew that even if you like Arch's opinion, while you want to give some solutions to this game, Arch on other hand, simply don't want to give the game second chance.
You like his opinion, but now I know that you're not like him. At least I gave that game a chance and I enjoyed it. Arch is stubborn to do this and even to swallow his pride. At least Total Biscuiy and Valrak, though they didn't liked that game too, aren't same as him. And I respect, partically Valrak, because I watched his vid, and I understanded that, but I respected this, since he isn't as much toxic and ranting streamer as Arch actually is.
Draconix
Well I can said it is matter of tastes, but I understand that you like his content. Still doesn't mean that everyone should like his content. I for example would prefer other streamer's content, especially those who are enjoying streaming this game like @2Sk3TCHY or Pshyc and even @FoxClaw. But as I said and I believe, its a matter of tastes.